Multidimensional hadiths (as coined by the author of the present paper) are used as evidence by those who believe in polysemy of the holy Quran. What are these hadiths? How reliable are they? These are questions that seem they should be answered precisely.Analyzing the existing data in a library method, the author tries to classify these hadiths so that he can find an appropriate answer for the above mentioned questions.It is necessary to note that this paper does not aim at rejecting or demonstrating the multidimensionality of the holy Quran but it tries to make an evaluation of these hadiths based on the criteria for hadith criticism in order to find their reliability or unreliability. As we should know the date of death of authors of hadith books so as to classify them, the author of this paper has written the date of their death next to their names.

Much have been said on polysemy and homonymy by linguistics. The Sunni Quranic researchers have considered a word having different meanings as homonymy and have studied the issue in different disciples of Arabic and Islamic Studies as lexicology, logic, usul, Qur' anic knowledges as in "Wujuh and Naza'er".The late Sunni Scholars have shown much interest about the sense relation of Quranic words and have found a general denotation in different usage of the wujuh words, while considering them as homonyms has led, to intricacy and forced them to regard these different usages as allegoric and metaphoric.Shia Scholars, on the other hand, have believed in polysemy in such occassions as the result of Qur' an's inimitability both literally and semantically.According to this view, such meaning of the word is a referent of a general meaning, which is completely coherent with Quran having numerous inward stages of meaning. As a result there is no need to consider the different usage of the Qur'anic words as allegoric and metaphoric. It is one reality that exists in its different referents and is considered as different denotation in Qur'anic linguistics.

"Al-wujuh wa al-naza' ir" is a branch of Quranic science which studies commentaries of Quranic words by consideration of: 1. circumstances of descent (Asbab al-nuzul), and 2. rules of the Arabic language. There are many works written in this subject. The authors of these books evidently refer to their beliefs and special views instead of making use of definite principles of interpretation. Sunni commentators explain words from Sunni point of view, and so do Shiite commentators. This leads to arbitrary definition of Quranic words so everyone can employ them as he wishes to prove his opinion. Thus, it seemed necessary to study the manner of these books in order to distinguish the true from false.

Based on the type and combination of raised capital, Partnership has been divided into four types of ‘ Inan, A‘ mal, Wujuh and Mufawadhah. Opinions differ greatly over the validity or invalidity of these types of partnership. Analyzing Islamic books reveal that disputes over A‘ mal and Mufawadhah partnership are more conspicuous. This controversy among Islamic jurists has made its way into the legal books as well. The most important reasons expressed by proponents of the validity of Wujuh partnership is related to the existence of some Hadiths, silence-based consensus, the special concern of Islam for cooperation and the nature of this partnership being a mixture of mandate and bail contracts. Instead, the opponents point out the incompatibility with public policy and morality, uncertainty, consensus, lack of Shariah-based evidence in support of the validity of this partnership and consensus. Putting emphasis on Shiite writings and taking a glance at Hanafi, Hanbali, Maliki and Shafi‘ i works and analyzing the reasons expressed by the proponents and opponents, this article seeks firstly to define Wujuh partnership and its various types, and reaches this conclusion that Wujuh partnership, in its common concept, is null and void in Shiite and current Iranian law accordingly.

The knowledge of polysemy (wujuh) is one the basic information required for the translators of Quran. Regarding different meanings of a word in Arabic language, at times a word has one meaning in a statement, while the same word has a completely opposite meaning in another statement, which can only be specified by its context. Therefore the knowledge of polysemy is considered as one the basic pre-required knowledge for comprehending Quran and is regarded as one of the Quranic sciences which provides the grounds for different probabilities in interpreting Quran, open to misunderstanding or misusage for those looking forward to making troubles.The existence of polysemy in the holy Quran indicates that this text has different stages of meaning, thus, the correct understanding of Quran depends on the understanding of it. Nevertheless the translators have been wrong in translating Quranic words, by rendering the word to one meaning regardless of different context or misinterpreting it to the wrong sense. In this article we have studied the translation of the word ' fitna' (trial, disturbance, ...) in five of the most prominent translations of Quran (Makarem, Fuladvand, Mujtabavi, Sadeghi Tehrani), mentioning their misunderstandings.

Artistic interweaving of stylistic aspects of those texts which have sublime styles is considered fundamental feature. In Ferdowsi’ s Shahnameh, as an epic masterpiece in the world, all stylistic aspects lead to revealing an epic style. What exists under the texture epic style appears to be the mythological-epic idea in terms of an Iranian one. this mythological-epic thought shows the space time from primitive era to periods civilization. This essay tries to represent the conceptual infrastructures of the story of Rostam and Sohrab in different aspects of stylistics such as mythological, epic, linguistic, visual and interpreter aspects. Therefore, stylistic aspects of the story of Rostam and Sohrab are representative of the becoming epic mythology of creation which reach as a conflict in the form of Rostam, Sohrab and Tahmineh which reminds becoming sacred kindness and fertility.